Bihishtābād

The History, Art and Architecture of the Mughal Empire

Archive for Conferences

Integration processes and identity formations in Eurasian empires

The ICH, University of Amsterdam in cooperation with the NWO Eurasian Empires Project is organising a series of workshops for MA and PhD students from Wednesday 29 August until Friday 31 August 2012 at the Institute for Culture and History of the University of Amsterdam. The program features Cédric Michon,  Carl Petry, and David Robinson. Deadline 7 May.

Advertisements

Modes of Perception for Early Modern Architecture

Via Art-Hist:

Session for the Society of Architectural Historians 2013 Annual Conference, Buffalo, New York, USA, 10-14 April 2013

A conundrum stands at the heart of early modern architecture: treatise authors argued for reasoned analysis by the hypothetical viewer, yet they also suggested responses that slipped beyond the strictures of reason’s control. One could calculate mathematical proportions precisely in one’s mind, and one could develop a cogent argument about a building’s purpose or the status of its owner from logically organized observations of its design. The fifteenth-century Leon Battista Alberti, however, argued for the psychological impact of beauty, while the eighteenth-century LeCamus de Mézières explored how buildings were sequential stage-sets that manipulated response. Such accounts mirrored enigmas inherent to the basic human process of perceiving the surrounding world, as it was described by early modern philosophers: the fallible senses, the deceptive imagination, and the tug of war between reason and the passions.

Scholars have considered the early modern viewer across architectural history, art history, science, and philosophy. Underpinning these approaches is a certainty about the human body: it can both reason and be reasoned about. Early modern architectural, philosophical, and scientific theorists, though, agreed that reason was as likely to be in collaboration as in competition with other human faculties. We invite papers that explore this conundrum of rational analysis, psychological response, and idiosyncratic imagination. What are the approaches and sources that could open up a multi-faceted, malleable relationship between the early modern viewer and the built environment? Topics to consider include: representations of viewer and building, contemporaneous recommendations about perception, building types evoking multi-faceted responses (e.g., social reform structures, theaters), memory spaces, and studies of particular viewers reacting to specific buildings. Please submit a CV and an abstract of not more than 300 words by 1 June 2012 to: Freek Schmidt, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands, +31205986372, f.h.schmidt@vu.nl; Kimberley Skelton, 50 Avalon Drive, #7222, Milford, CT 06460, USA, 443-253-5529, kcskelton1@gmail.com. It is also possible to submit these materials online at: http://www.sah.org/index.php?cid=548761&src=gendocs&ref=Callfor papers 2013&category=Annual Conference 2013&submenu=1&curlid=476#o.

Universalisms in Conflict

Tomorrow and Saturday (9 and 10 March) the Institute for Art and Theory and Cultural Studies at the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna will host a symposium on challenges facing global art history (and philosophy) as they struggle to move beyond traditional Eurocentrist modes.

. . . the rhetoric of “new challenges” and a necessary “new orientation” of art history often disregards the political dimensions of anti- and post-colonial critiques of the writing of history. Alternative approaches, which are based on case studies of specific constellations in transcultural contact zones, are able to produce deeper insights into the intercontinental artistic and discursive relations under colonial and postcolonial conditions.

%d bloggers like this: